Saturday, 12 May 2012
-
Time Magazine Cover
Well, my my my, here I am again, writing a blog about societal/political stuff. Or is that sociopolitical? Probably. It's that damn talk show I started listening to on my way to work - need to stop that and switch back to girlie Kpop...
So, on the radio I hear them talking about breast feeding and the picture on the cover of Time Magazine. I'm thinking the picture is of a very innocent looking young mother, demurely nursing her infant son. Then last night I see the picture posted on a fellow Xangans blog. I have only one word to say - Incest. Or two words - Incest and pedophilia. Or three words - Incest, pedophilia and child porn.
I'm not outraged or shocked - nothing does that to me anymore, but I'm amazed that, what with all the bitcing and whining going on about child porn and pedophilia, that they would publish something like that. Hey, I don't care about incest - "the family that lays together stays together" (an old joke from my high school days). Or visit Denmark. Or Canada. Or West Virginia.
My point here is that that picture goes against all the indications of child porn and they stick it on the cover of a national magazine. The looks on their faces says it all...that "Ooo look what I'm doing, aren't I naughty and bad because I'm about to have sex with my mommy (son) and I know you wanna watch" look. I've seen that look a million times. What does Time think I am, stupid? So what if they aren't naked? Most porn flicks start out with the "actors" clothed and working their way into nakedness. For crying out loud, that picture wouldn't even be at the beginning of the flick, it would be about a third of the way into it, where they start doing things to each other, after the families meet at the Joneses home so the kids can "play together" and the adults can have a few drinks and "play cards." The kid is supposed to be three years old in that picture. Give me a break, the kid is a short teenager with army pants on for chrissake.
You can find that picture on a thumbnail in the "Mommy Does Son" porno section. I'm laughing my ass off here...I could crack on that picture all day, but I want to make a music video today. He said "crack......"
Post a Comment
- Back to runisom48's Xanga Site!
- Note: your comment will appear in runisom48's local time zone: GMT -05:00 (Eastern Standard - US, Canada)



Comments (8)
that was something.
Yeah, that's the same point I was trying to make when they posted this on healthkicker and momaroo. There are lots of pedophiles who would love to have this cover of the magazine in their sick collection. But I guess people enjoy being blind...
Why are they making such a big issue out of breast feeding? In Asian countries - even Muslim countries such as Indonesia - you see mothers casually breast feed their babies in public places.
Yeah, it's pretty gross. And really, really, fucking creepy.
I was equally pissed off by the headline: Are You Mom Enough? Hell yes, I'm mom enough. I'm mom enough to know when to wean my children, which she obviously isn't. When her child goes to school and has to face all sorts of bullying for being four and still on the tit, we'll see how she feels about AP then. So yeah, in terms of common sense, I think I'm mom enough.
If she had to deal with the situation I live with on a daily basis, with few breaks and no fucking help (like I do), would SHE be mom enough?
Thanks, man. I haven't had a good rant in days. Felt good.
I agree with you. Nursing has to stop at some point in a child's life. Nature indicates it. I'd say starting with the teething stage. Kid has teeth? Lay off Mama's nip, and that includes the 1st grade when all the kid wants for Christmas is his two front teeth! That photo is perverted (a perversion of Nature).
@Xcite_Media - I agree, Just let the moms breastfeed and leave them alone, but it's not that simple in this country. This countrys Christian background makes sure of that.
@ZombieMom_Speaks - You're welcome. You go girl.
That photo was totally lame.